Difference between revisions of "Version Control System"
From Freeside
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Choice #1: Move to subversion, it's CVS 2.0 anyway. | Choice #1: Move to subversion, it's CVS 2.0 anyway. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Subversion (+svk?) - CVS 2.0. Who needs a distributed VCS anyway? (C, svk perl) | ||
Choice #2: Move to a distributed VCS. | Choice #2: Move to a distributed VCS. | ||
| − | |||
* Git - all the cool kids are using it these days (C) | * Git - all the cool kids are using it these days (C) | ||
* monotone (C++) | * monotone (C++) | ||
| − | |||
* Mercurial/Hg (python) | * Mercurial/Hg (python) | ||
* Bazaar - Canoical/Ubuntu/Launchpad (python) | * Bazaar - Canoical/Ubuntu/Launchpad (python) | ||
Revision as of 18:31, 23 October 2009
We need to move off of CVS eventually.
Choice #1: Move to subversion, it's CVS 2.0 anyway.
- Subversion (+svk?) - CVS 2.0. Who needs a distributed VCS anyway? (C, svk perl)
Choice #2: Move to a distributed VCS.
- Git - all the cool kids are using it these days (C)
- monotone (C++)
- Mercurial/Hg (python)
- Bazaar - Canoical/Ubuntu/Launchpad (python)
- Darcs (haskell)
Not considering
- Codeville, its dead jim
- Vesta, commercial abandonware, not distributed
Random others
- Aegis - a strange beast. Probably not for us.
References
