Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supaplex"
From Freeside
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| + | == equip + setup fees == | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
> Selling hardware/setup fees... I spent a long time talking with our DSL | > Selling hardware/setup fees... I spent a long time talking with our DSL | ||
> guy about this. We'd really like to put both hardware and install fees | > guy about this. We'd really like to put both hardware and install fees | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
Just use a flat price plan with no recurring frequency or recurring fee. | Just use a flat price plan with no recurring frequency or recurring fee. | ||
Put the charge in as the setup fee. | Put the charge in as the setup fee. | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
Latest revision as of 06:46, 12 February 2008
ivan: merge http://www.freeside.biz/mediawiki/index.php/Freeside-queued into the POD docs in freeside-queued (HEAD and FREESIDE_1_7_BRANCH) and relink anything you'd pointed there to Freeside:1.7:Documentation:Developer/bin/freeside-queued
when you make new documentation pages, such as the "Backend_service" one you link to, put them under Freeside:1.7:Documentation:
equip + setup fees
> Selling hardware/setup fees... I spent a long time talking with our DSL
> guy about this. We'd really like to put both hardware and install fees
> for DSL/T1 installs as separate packages.
>
> [...]
>
> So for a non-recurring package like an install fee or CPE, what's the best
> price plan to select?
I totally don't see a problem with making packages for one-time fees for
equipment or circuit installs. There's development scheduled in 1.9
that will make it easier to order a bundle with those packages.
Just use a flat price plan with no recurring frequency or recurring fee.
Put the charge in as the setup fee.
