Difference between revisions of "Version Control System"
From Freeside
(New page: We need to move off of CVS eventually. Choice #1: Move to subversion, it's CVS 2.0 anyway. Choice #2: Move to a distributed VCS. * Subversion - CVS 2.0. Who needs a distributed VCS any...) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
References | References | ||
| − | Zooko [http://zooko.com/revision_control_quick_ref.html] | + | * Zooko [http://zooko.com/revision_control_quick_ref.html] |
| + | * Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software] | ||
Revision as of 17:10, 23 October 2009
We need to move off of CVS eventually.
Choice #1: Move to subversion, it's CVS 2.0 anyway.
Choice #2: Move to a distributed VCS.
- Subversion - CVS 2.0. Who needs a distributed VCS anyway? (C)
- Git - all the cool kids are using it these days (C)
- monotone (C++)
- svk - disribution based on subversion, best practical sponsors it, RT uses it (perl)
- Mercurial/Hg (python)
- Bazaar - Canoical/Ubuntu/Launchpad (python)
- Darcs (haskell)
Not considering
- Codeville, its dead jim
- Vesta, commercial abandonware, not distributed
Random others
- Aegis - a strange beast. Probably not for us.
References
