Difference between revisions of "Virtual to Real Fields"
From Freeside
BocdoMlano (talk | contribs) |
(reverting spam) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
= Introduction = | = Introduction = | ||
Virtual fields need to be overhauled in 1.9. They should be real fields in the relevant table, and all the complexity in Record.pm, lack of history and so on can be fixed. FS::part_virtual_field can still stick around to keep track of the new fields we've added to tables. | Virtual fields need to be overhauled in 1.9. They should be real fields in the relevant table, and all the complexity in Record.pm, lack of history and so on can be fixed. FS::part_virtual_field can still stick around to keep track of the new fields we've added to tables. |
Latest revision as of 16:03, 25 July 2009
Introduction
Virtual fields need to be overhauled in 1.9. They should be real fields in the relevant table, and all the complexity in Record.pm, lack of history and so on can be fixed. FS::part_virtual_field can still stick around to keep track of the new fields we've added to tables.